solidbond
6:34 Sun Mar 7
Re: Lingard
|
Can he play against the mancs next week?
|
VirginiaHam
10:18 Mon Mar 1
Re: Lingard
|
Far Cough 6:15 Sun Feb 28
Has to be a better option than a lumpy Frenchman who costs 45m.
|
Queens Fish Bar
9:51 Mon Mar 1
Re: Lingard
|
Mad Dog 9:28 Thu Jan 28
Except he is proving he fits the team with the way he and they have been playing?
|
Mex Martillo
5:54 Mon Mar 1
Re: Lingard
|
That’s a bit naughty, Alfs.
|
Alfs
6:43 Mon Mar 1
Re: Lingard
|
He'll stay if he gets reassurances that we're building rather than selling. Rice is on the same page. They get on with each other exceptionally well. Mason may be getting a little jealous.
Just what I've been told. Take it as you like.
|
Darlo Debs
2:22 Mon Mar 1
Re: Lingard
|
Was, like many on.here, not entirely sure this was the best move but happy to be wrong, he is a great loan signing, and well worth 20m.
Seems really happy being a hammer too
|
Mex Martillo
7:38 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
If we do get into Europe, I think he will stay with us. Actually I think we will hold onto all our top players if we’re into Europe.
|
Side of Ham
6:44 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Why don’t we just sit back and ensure this is the kind of performance we will get for the majority of games? Worrying about what may or may not happen is why we are often seen as a two bob club, we are in pole position if he is indeed sold by Manchester United we signed him and he is already doing his best to embed himself into our club. I like him and it’s clear he likes our club.
|
Far Cough
6:36 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
I'm pretty sure clubs can have a pre window agreement?
What we don't want is an auction, the bloke seems quite happy here and if we do make Europe, all the better for him and us
|
gph
6:24 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Can we pay for him now?
Before he puts his price up by continuing to play well.
I'm guessing no.
I mean, there must be some reason why it's called a transfer window.
|
Far Cough
6:15 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Man U have set a price of 20 million on Lingard:
https://www.express.co.uk/sport/football/1403626/Manchester-United-news-Jesse-Lingard-West-Ham-transfers?fbclid=IwAR2jCYoYNNjdS9RvCPJUs4e4_-BruL-hkrQdPIJQLJx8LaXZMm9csqU_0_Y
GET HIM IN NOW!
|
Fifth Column
5:13 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Also, would you rather live in Leicester or London? I'd be more concerned about Arsenal potentially coming in for him.
|
Stevethehammer
3:38 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Leicester might be interested but will he walk into their team considering how good their midfield is.
He compliments our team so well and baring injury Moyes will pick him every week.
We have a good mix of English players that he already knows and the team morale right now is the best it has been in years, Lingard has taken to the club early on and bought in some extra spark to the dressing room and the pitch.
Leicester might have some pull about them but I think with an offer from us or them on the table, I'd fancy our chances.
|
geoffpikey
2:51 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Leicester interested, reportedly. Which is a major worry if we have serious ambitions of signing him full time in the summer. But, again, reportedly trying to extend Harvey Barnes' contract amid interest from Liverpool and Manchester Utd so hopefully they spend all their money on him. Similar (ish) players.
|
geoffpikey
2:43 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
"terrible" yesterday?!
Micah Richards thought he was our best player. Again.
Of course, ex-pro pundits are sometimes clueless. On the other hand...
|
AKA ERNIE
2:39 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Fraser depends how much they want
Fifth disagree mate but fair enough
|
Fifth Column
1:40 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Stowie, I agree this is not anywhere near the best set of individual players we've had since 86. However, I think it is the best "team" we've had ie playing as a unit, never giving up, working hard and getting results.
|
Fifth Column
1:39 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
"terrible"! Have a word with yourself. He had a good game yesterday, in middle third he almost never gives away the ball. In the final third he play difficult, tight passes that really require someone with a football brain to anticipate. I love Antonio but his anticipation of passes is non-existent.
Benrahma suffers from a similar problem of playing tight, angled passes that need anticipation.
Man City played several passes in the box that came to nothing yesterday. You wouldn't call them terrible.
Wasn't Lingard the one who put the ball onto Diop's head from 40 yards in the last second?
Lingard was poor against Fulham but then most of them were.
|
fraser
1:30 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
Too early to say, let's see where we finish.
|
Stowie.40
1:19 Sun Feb 28
Re: Lingard
|
I don’t think this is the best team we’ve had since 86, not by a long shot IMO.
|
| 
